Overloaded server
Steffen Grunewald
steffen.grunewald at aei.mpg.de
Fri Jun 22 17:36:29 CEST 2007
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 05:08:14PM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:42:40 +0200, Steffen Grunewald <steffen.grunewald at aei.mpg.de> said:
>
> > yesterday I tried to FAI setup about 600 nodes using one file/webserver.
> Wow. Did you start them all at once? Or with some time (how long)
> between each poweron? I would have expected more problems with TFTP.
Spread over about 20 minutes, in batches of about 100. :-)
> > was no problem, I got lots of http download errors (resulting in that
> > famous Broken package, and error 25600 messages).
> Maybe the webswerver only allows a certain amount of connections at a
> time? How was the CPU load?
don't know. standard apache (2?) of Sarge.
CPU load was not too high I guess ... I'm installing 50 nodes right now, and
some nfsds are busy, load <<5. I've seen loads up to 60.
Is there a similar limitation to apache threads as it is with nfsds?
> I don't understand that.
grep -q "Broken package" $LOGDIR/fai.log && reboot
> > but that
> > would deprive me of the correctly downloaded error messages... how much
> > effort would it be to run the savelog task before the chboot task? (and
> > has there be a reason for the current order?)
> Just log into a machine and read /tmp/fai/*.log
I cannot if it reboots itself. Reboot by hand is counterintuitive with FAI.
The only (small) problem is that I cannot track machines which might have
different problems, cycling through the instell for ever...
So why does chboot precede savelog? Any reasonable reason?
S
More information about the linux-fai
mailing list