softupdate

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Monday 20 August 2007 15:02, Per Foreby wrote:
> Here is an update of the problem description:
>
> With my extra "aptitude update" in te softupdate hook, the output looks
> like this on consecutive softupdates:
[...]
> W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.ddg.lth.se etch Release: The following
> signatures were i
> nvalid: BADSIG 0FB2A45B5A214303 Datordriftgruppen LTH package signing
> key <dpkg@> ddg.lth.se>

Uh.

> The "aptitude update" from my hook fails, but the second run (in
> updatebase) succeds.
>
> This happens on consecutive souftupdates. However, if I run "aptitude
> update" manually, then all errors are gone, and my extra update is
> probably not needed.

Strange.

> So the question is: What's the difference between running the update in
> the fai scripts, and running it on the command line. Caching, ...?

I don't know (without looking at the code), but I'd suggest you file a bug 
against fai-client so that we can track and fix the issue.


regards,
	Holger
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Bin?rdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname   : nicht verf?gbar
Dateityp    : application/pgp-signature
Dateigr??e  : 189 bytes
Beschreibung: nicht verf?gbar
URL         : http://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai/attachments/20070821/de8dfaf8/attachment.bin