FAI kernel image without modules.
Sam Vilain
sam at vilain.net
Tue Feb 4 12:49:45 CET 2003
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:20, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> As a rule I use kernels without module support built in for my kernels.
> It's not that I care that deeply about the issue -- it's just that
> having everything I use built in means that I don't have to administer
> module configuration or anything like that.
Watch out. Some kernel modules (eg, most PCMCIA drivers) don't even work
when hard compiled in. This might just be the momma's boy modules who
rely heavily on userspace programs. But it also makes it more difficult
to set driver options; you need to do it on the kernel command line.
What's better - having to configure a modules.conf, or having to deal with
the side effects of dozens of buggy Linux kernel drivers misinitialising
on bootup?
The answer, of course, depends on the variety of systems you have - and
hence the number of drivers you need to compile in.
--
Sam Vilain, sam at vilain.net
Real Programmers don't write in LISP. Only faggot programs contain
more parenthesis than actual code.
More information about the linux-fai
mailing list