FAI kernel image without modules.
Daniel Pittman
daniel at rimspace.net
Tue Feb 4 13:23:08 CET 2003
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Sam Vilain wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:20, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> As a rule I use kernels without module support built in for my
>> kernels. It's not that I care that deeply about the issue -- it's
>> just that having everything I use built in means that I don't have to
>> administer module configuration or anything like that.
>
> Watch out. Some kernel modules (eg, most PCMCIA drivers) don't even
> work when hard compiled in.
*nod*
[...]
> What's better - having to configure a modules.conf, or having to deal
> with the side effects of dozens of buggy Linux kernel drivers
> misinitialising on bootup?
In my experience, having to deal with the buggy drivers, simply because
I am yet to meet a driver which doesn't work compiled in.
> The answer, of course, depends on the variety of systems you have -
> and hence the number of drivers you need to compile in.
Yes. Your millage may vary and, with my laptop, I have more need of
modules than on servers. Their configuration never changes...
Daniel
--
There is nothing men more readily give themselves to than pushing their own
beliefs. When ordinary means fail, they add commandment, violence, fire and
sword.
-- Michel Eyquem de Montaigne, _Essays_, Book. I, Ch. 39 (1580)
More information about the linux-fai
mailing list