output for parted 1.8.8 (or older releases)

Thomas Lange lange at informatik.uni-koeln.de
Thu Jun 12 10:47:00 CEST 2014


>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:27:31 +0200, Thomas Neumann <blacky+fai at fluffbunny.de> said:

    > @Thomas L: What do you think about changing 'parted' into 'parted >=2.0' in 
    > the package dependencies for fai-setup-storage and ignore parted 1.x? Even 
    > Ubuntu 10.04 was shipping with 2.2.
Since even Debian oldstable (aka squeeze) is using parted > 2.3, IMO
it's not necessary to add the version to the dependencies.
Noone will ever install FAI versions from unstable (only those would
have the >=2.0 included) to such an old system.

-- 
regards Thomas


More information about the linux-fai mailing list