[OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Thu Jan 8 12:41:00 CET 2009

Hi Thomas,

On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009, Thomas Lange wrote:
> No, not really. I did some performance tests in the past, and there were
> no real differences in the installation times. Sometimes http was slightly
> faster than NFS, but I think this was the cause of the NFS server.

Interesting, thanks for the info.

> HTTP is easier to set up IMO, that's why I use HTTP.

Yeah, especially on the internet and in DMZs :)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai/attachments/20090108/8d772b41/attachment.bin 

More information about the linux-fai mailing list