[OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs

Thomas Lange lange at informatik.uni-koeln.de
Thu Jan 8 11:26:36 CET 2009

>>>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:58:11 +0100, Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> said:

    >  Using nfs is faster though: 
No, not really. I did some performance tests in the past, and there were
no real differences in the installation times. Sometimes http was slightly
faster than NFS, but I think this was the cause of the NFS server.

HTTP is easier to set up IMO, that's why I use HTTP.
regards Thomas

More information about the linux-fai mailing list