[OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs
Thomas Lange
lange at informatik.uni-koeln.de
Thu Jan 8 11:26:36 CET 2009
>>>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:58:11 +0100, Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> said:
> Using nfs is faster though:
No, not really. I did some performance tests in the past, and there were
no real differences in the installation times. Sometimes http was slightly
faster than NFS, but I think this was the cause of the NFS server.
HTTP is easier to set up IMO, that's why I use HTTP.
--
regards Thomas
More information about the linux-fai
mailing list