FAI failure...

[Ian Colquhoun]

Jens,

Hmm... I don't know.. something is definitely funky on the mail server
at informatik.uni-koeln.de. Every message I've been getting from you
since yesterday has come in twice, one with:

ruehmkorf at informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE

and one with:

ruehmkorf at informatik.uni-koeln.de

One message seems to take an extra hop. Here are the headers from
one:

Received: from mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE
[134.95.100.208])
        by magellan.sheridanc.on.ca (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id
f9QGlHw04897 
        for <ian.colquhoun at sheridanc.on.ca>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:47:17
-0400  
Received: (from daemon at localhost)
        by mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA09330
        for linux-fai-out; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:22:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE
(rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.9.10])
        by mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA09310
        for <linux-fai at uni-koeln.de>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:22:55 +0200
(MET DST)
Received: from localhost (ruehmkorf at localhost)
        by rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE
(8.8.8/8.8.8/RRZK-CL-8.8.6-1) with ESMTP id SAA03658;
        Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:22:53 +0200 (MET DST)

And here are the headers from the other:

Received: from rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE
(rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.9.10])
        by magellan.sheridanc.on.ca (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id
f9QGMsw03698
        for <ian.colquhoun at sheridanc.on.ca>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:22:54
-0400
Received: from localhost (ruehmkorf at localhost)
        by rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE
(8.8.8/8.8.8/RRZK-CL-8.8.6-1) with ESMTP id SAA03658;
        Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:22:53 +0200 (MET DST)


Strange...

Ian.


On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:22:53PM +0200, Jens Ruehmkorf wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Ian Colquhoun wrote:
> 
> > I figured out a way around this problem thanks to the suggestions. The
> > suggestion from Jens to change the sfdisk flag from -l to -g actually
> > caused a division by zero error in the setup_harddisks script so I
> > wrote my own patch to setup_harddisks. Hope it might help others.
> 
> for some reason the delivery of the last emails was delayed by about one
> day, so my response was not needed anymore -- because you intuitively did
> just as I suggested :)
> 
> More interesting, the delivery of the last three posts (after message id
> <15320.7583.103259.292897 at informatik.uni-koeln.de>) was exactly in reverse
> order. Any idea what could cause this?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Jens
> 
> --
> ruehmkorf at informatik dot uni hyphen koeln dot de
>