stable-proposed-updates?

[Michael Tautschnig]

Hi Holger,

[...]
> Since yesterday there is svn://svn.debian.org/svn/fai/branches/lenny which was 
> discussed with Thomas and Luk Claes from the releaseteam. 
> 
> I also looked through the BTS on tuesday and suggested several other bugs, but 
> there were non suited except maybe #464541. 
> 
> You can read our discussions at 
> http://layer-acht.org/fai-irc/fai.log.20090217.html
> 
Ok, then it's all fine, I had only noticed the commits and these contained no
information about a coordination with the release team :-)

> I plan to upload 3.2.16-lenny1 this saturday, so you still have some time. I'm 
> also happy to upload 3.2.16-lenny2 later if needed. After the upload is done, 
> I will add it to the above mentioned wiki page and mail the release team.
> 
> (Note: one should not upload to s-p-u without talking to the SRMs first. But 
> as I have done this... :)
> 
Sure.

> 
> I also think that we shouldnt spend too much time on s-p-u, as fai installs 
> just fine from unstable. So we should rather work on 3.2.17 and beyond :)
> (But non working perl scripts is too much of a brown paper bug to ignore, IMO, 
> thats why I worked on fai for s-p-u :-)
> 

There is the recently filed #515101, which includes a missing patch for a bug
already meant to be fixed in 3.2.5; you definitely noticed that one since you
reopened it: Wouldn't be also nice to include a patch for that one (both in
3.2.16-lenny1 and 3.2.17)?

Best,
Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai-devel/attachments/20090220/d6189226/attachment.bin