stable-proposed-updates?

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Michael,

On Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2009, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> as there seem to be preparations for a bugfix release targeted at lenny:
> should we get ourselves listed at
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1 ? If so, does
> anybody know about the procedures?

Since yesterday there is svn://svn.debian.org/svn/fai/branches/lenny which was 
discussed with Thomas and Luk Claes from the releaseteam. 

I also looked through the BTS on tuesday and suggested several other bugs, but 
there were non suited except maybe #464541. 

You can read our discussions at 
http://layer-acht.org/fai-irc/fai.log.20090217.html

I plan to upload 3.2.16-lenny1 this saturday, so you still have some time. I'm 
also happy to upload 3.2.16-lenny2 later if needed. After the upload is done, 
I will add it to the above mentioned wiki page and mail the release team.

(Note: one should not upload to s-p-u without talking to the SRMs first. But 
as I have done this... :)


I also think that we shouldnt spend too much time on s-p-u, as fai installs 
just fine from unstable. So we should rather work on 3.2.17 and beyond :)
(But non working perl scripts is too much of a brown paper bug to ignore, IMO, 
thats why I worked on fai for s-p-u :-)

regards,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai-devel/attachments/20090219/4914b65e/attachment.bin