New features, and bugfix for faimond

[Christoffer Kugg Jerkeby]

On 8/25/07, Christoffer Kugg Jerkeby <kugghjul at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Thomas Lange <lange at informatik.uni-koeln.de> wrote:
> > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:34:51 +0200, Jonas Eriksson <zqad at hpc2n.umu.se> said:
> >
> >     > Two of these patches makes FAI behave different, and have
> >     > different dependecies, why I'm hesitating to submit them to the
> >     > debian bug tracker, risking that they will spawn a discussion
> >     > better fitted for a normal mailing list.
> >
> >     > Now, where would you like the patches?
> > I would suggest to send them to fai at informatik.... that's only me. I
> > can review those patches, and if I'm conviced and include them, no
> > futher discussion is needed. If I do not include them right now, and
> > like to have discussions, you may post them in this list (I think
> > they are not huge), put the in the bts (and we discuss them here), or
> > maybe put them into a separate svn branch.
> >
> > If the patches are rather small, just post them here and we will
> > discuss them.
> > --
> > regards Thomas
> >
>
> Hi Fai-people, my name is Christoffer and I am desiging/drawing
> graphics for the faimondgui.
> From my point of view the daemon fork patch is really good, since its
> is a reliable design for how to handle incomming connections and
> gui-events separately (depending on the contets of the patch, but
> accrding to you descriptions, this is something I would like to see
> happen).
>
> Best regards Christoffer Jerkeby
>

Ok nevermind me Im confused, my previous email assumed that the
Proc::Daemon patch was for the faimond-gui not the fai-server.

Br Christoffer Jerkeby