fai bugs against policy - lets get this fixed NOW...

[Michael Tautschnig]

> Hi,
> 
> On Monday 10 July 2006 13:12, Henning Sprang wrote:
> > Things for which the rules in Debian are set for etch should really be
> > fixed as soon as possible - if there's a final decision in Debian for
> > which FHS version to go, then the bug should be handled.
> 
> As written in my mail which started this thread, Debian has changed the policy 
> to mandate FHS 2.3. Thats the latest FHS version, so it's final. 
> 
Nice to know, however, ...

> 
> Also, I dont see how changing the default setting of a configuration variable 
> effects any existing installation, you need to modify fai.conf to use it, and 
> modified config files are not touched on upgrades.
>

even though I agree that this should not cause any harm, there might be some
unexpected side effects. Thus I urge for the modified package being tested
before it gets uploaded to unstable, and I'd suggest we do the testing at
Linuxhotel.

Best,
Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai-devel/attachments/20060710/36ebfdb2/attachment.bin