addpackages removed in FAI 2.9?
Thomas Lange
lange at informatik.uni-koeln.de
Wed Dec 28 19:16:25 CET 2005
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:54:25 +0100, Henning Sprang <henning_sprang at gmx.de> said:
> let's think about again of letting the FAI_CONFIGDIR start with a
> directory of classnames, so classes are not spread all over the
> configspace, but in a single directory hierarchy. That way, users can
> swap classes much more easily, packages can be easily updated. If we
> have a better place for our config dir, we could even pack classes in
> packages, so they get individually updateable, installable, shareable
> between users and developers!
This wouldn't make sense for the files/ directory tree. Maybe it's
useful for the other directories. But IMO this would change FAI a lot.
But it's up to you to try it and send us your experiences with another
layout of the whole config space.
--
regards Thomas
More information about the linux-fai-devel
mailing list