setup-storage for raid5 + lvm
Nicolas Courtel
courtel at cena.fr
Tue Apr 28 19:20:10 CEST 2009
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
>> Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>>>> So, mysteriously, that information is lost afterwards. Hmm, looking at the code
>>>>> of vol_id it seems that parted might have overridden the volume id for
>>>>> /dev/sda2 (instead of /dev/sda1 or /dev/sda3). Could you re-run that failing
>>>>> installation and, once it aborts, do
>>>>>
>>>>> parted -s /dev/sda print
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This looks ok:
>>>>
>>>> # parted -s /dev/sda print
>>>> [...]
>>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>>> 1 32.3kB 535MB 535MB primary ext2 raid
>>>> 2 535MB 1604MB 1069MB primary linux-swap 3
>>>> 1604MB 320GB 318GB primary raid
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No raid on sda2, but vol_id disagrees:
>>>>
>>>> # /lib/udev/vol_id --export /dev/sda2
>>>> ID_FS_USAGE=raid
>>>> ID_FS_TYPE=linux_raid_member
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Did /dev/sda2 ever belong to a RAID array? Could you please try
>>> - parted -s /dev/sda set 2 raid off
>>> - run vol_id
>>> - mkswap /dev/sda2
>>> - run vol_id
>>>
>>>
>> Nothing interesting happens... The disk has been in a raid 1 array a
>> while ago, but the partitioning was different, and has been cleaned up
>> by the new installation.
>>
>>
>
> Ok, maybe mdadm helps, but I don't know for sure how to apply it:
>
> - Does mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda2 work? If not, you might need to run
> mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda.
> - Does running vol_id work afterwards?
>
>
You got it:
# mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda2
# /lib/udev/vol_id -u /dev/sda2
6428a2d1-c30d-4916-ab6b-625117989651
#
I wonder how this mdadm data was still there, though...
Thanks for your help,
--
Nicolas
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: http://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai/attachments/20090428/ab2430c0/attachment.htm
More information about the linux-fai
mailing list